Optimal betting

[ZeeBabar]

I just put it on the calculator at this site. BR 15,000. 80 hands per hour, spreading 1-7, doubling 9-11, H17, DAS and this is what I got. What is puzzling is the higher bet for TC3 than for TC's that are higher. Can someone explain it?

Average Bet	Results			Std Dev		Risk of Ruin	Performance
%W/L	Win Rate	$/Hr.	Hand	Hour	DI	c-SCORE	CE	CE/WR	N0
2.223	1.068%	1.900	$47.49	3.516	31.444	9.9%	6.75	45.62	$26.89	0.57	27388

	Count Freq.	EV		Standard Deviation	Optimal Bets
Count	Win/Loss	Std. Error	Exact	Chips
<=-1	33.66%	-2.08%	0.00	1.151	1.00	25
0	35.55%	-0.35%	0.00	1.140	1.00	25
1	8.70%	0.43%	0.01	1.140	1.99	50
2	7.44%	0.95%	0.01	1.142	4.39	100
3	3.40%	1.42%	0.01	1.146	6.47	200
4	4.44%	2.01%	0.01	1.149	7.00	175
5	2.22%	2.67%	0.01	1.151	7.00	175
6	1.65%	3.33%	0.01	1.150	7.00	175
7	.69%	3.83%	0.02	1.148	7.00	175
8	.92%	4.41%	0.02	1.144	7.00	175
9	.53%	5.14%	0.03	1.139	7.00	175
10	.34%	5.84%	0.03	1.134	7.00	175
11	.09%	6.26%	0.06	1.130	7.00	175
>=12	.38%	7.40%	0.03	1.122	7.00	175

[Three]

It is a mistake. Look at the unit bets. TC +3 is not greater than higher TC's. You see 1.99 units is made to 2 units, and 4.39 units is made to 4 units for practical bets. I don't know why 6.47 units is made to 8 units. Especially because 7 units remain 7 units.

[Norm]

The online calculator is a very old version of the CVCX calculator. It has some difficulties when the Rational Bets option is set in some cases.

[Freightman]

Something us haywire with your input. Some of the result numbers don't make sense. But, why are you concerned with an optimal betting ramp?