Index Generation: Difference for ENHC & American Style

[greg16394]

In Felt - F Strategy, indices are different for American style and ENHC.
Even in ENHC, if rule is OBO(lose original bet only against dealer black jack), then it shouldn't be different.
If CVDATA consider the time delay of dealer's second card, it is understandable.
Surrender index of 16 against 10 is -6 in American style, -13 in ENHC.
My local stores have different rules. Need to clarify.

[Norm]

Yes, ENHC and HC are different. I don't understand the question.

[Freightman]

In Felt - F Strategy, indices are different for American style and ENHC.
Even in ENHC, if rule is OBO(lose original bet only against dealer black jack), then it shouldn't be different.
If CVDATA consider the time delay of dealer's second card, it is understandable.
Surrender index of 16 against 10 is -6 in American style, -13 in ENHC.
My local stores have different rules. Need to clarify.

You have a basic misunderstanding of ENHC. If you lose OBO, then the game is not ENHC. It is simply NHC. It means that your indexes are going to be so close between hole card and no hole card, that generating new indexes is virtually a waste of time.

[greg16394]

Yes, ENHC and HC are different. I don't understand the question.

QUESTION IS';
Is it worth to memorize two sets of indices and practice by setting options in CVBJ ?
It might be waste of time as Freightman said.

[DSchles]

The indices aren't going to be "so close"; they're identical.

Don

[greg16394]

It is so clear.
Thanks a lot.