Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: TC 0 Indices

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    TC 0 Indices

    As a recent BJ convert (I've learned BS, I18 and Fab4), I'm in the process of learning additional indices to strengthen my game. According to my CVBJ software, the following situations all have an index of 0 for the game I'm playing (HiLo 8D, S17, LS, DAS):
    16 v 10
    12 v 4
    A2 v 5
    33 v 2
    A7 v 2
    and 88 v 10 for Surrender

    What I find confusing is that the last two indices suggest a play different than BS at an index of 0 which doesn't make sense to me. What am I missing?

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    First of all, the surrender index of zero is wrong for 8,8 vs. 10. It's +1 for NDAS and +2 for DAS, no matter what you see anywhere.. Second, BS has nothing to do with an index of zero. That isn't how it's derived.

    Don

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    3rd rock from Sol, Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    14,158


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    As Don pointed out BS is not the same as play at TC 0. BS is the play that is correct only considering the cards in your hand and the dealer's up-card. They made have a 0 RC and they may not. TC 0 is the count for all seen cards. It averages a lot of different situations that all have TC 0. BS only consider a few cards and averages very few possible situations as it only assumes you have seen a few cards.

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    For your rule set, basic strategy is stand on A7v2.
    Index 0 means you'll double down A7v2 >= 0, else stand if < 0.

    Surrender 8,8v10 >= 0, else split if < 0.
    EV of surrendering is -0.5, which is less costly than the EV of splitting at positive counts.
    You split < 0 because the EV is -0.4X, which is less costly than surrendering.

    Just in case you're also confused about 12v4, since basic strategy says to always stand, you hit 12v4 < 0, else follow basic strategy and stand if >= 0.

  5. #5
    Senior Member bigplayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    1,807


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Basic strategy does not assume a TC of 0

  6. #6
    Senior Member BigJer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    In your soul.
    Posts
    1,529


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by DSchles View Post
    First of all, the surrender index of zero is wrong for 8,8 vs. 10. It's +1 for NDAS and +2 for DAS, no matter what you see anywhere.. Second, BS has nothing to do with an index of zero. That isn't how it's derived.

    Don
    I also didn't understand this either about some of the indices. I thought there was an error in, listen to this, Beyond Counting! So if you do something like hit a 16 vs. a 10 it's because it's right off the top there is no other than a RC-1 in which case you hit. But it's not hit at TC0.
    My Ability in Blackjack is a Gift from God!!

  7. #7
    Banned or Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Eastern U S A
    Posts
    6,830


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    The Index for 16 vs. 10 (SD, Hi-Opt II) is -0.3

Similar Threads

  1. Mr. Ed: Indices?
    By Mr. Ed in forum Blackjack Beginners
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-08-2004, 01:19 AM
  2. GT: AC Hi-Lo Indices
    By GT in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-02-2004, 09:58 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.