Looking for a reputable US firm for a sim

**Picasso** · 08-11-2015, 01:35 PM

I’m looking for a reputable US firm to sim a BJ method and was wondering if any of you have a firm to recommend. It really needs to be reputable and with the strictest confidentiality to its customers. Do you have a firm to recommend? Thanks in advance!

**moo321** · 08-11-2015, 03:21 PM

I'd recommend the firm of Wattenberger and Associates.

**Norm** · 08-11-2015, 03:27 PM

Anyone that would charge you for simming a progression system is not reputable by definition.

**Picasso** · 08-11-2015, 03:34 PM

You know Norm, if the sim doesn’t show a profit, I’ll be the first to be surprised. I want it to be clean and reputable.

**Picasso** · 08-12-2015, 04:14 AM

I have decided to solicit M.I.T. for this endeavour.

dogman_1234: it's a progression, no card counting. I need absolute proof before doing anything else. All I have thus far is lot money in the bank but that is hardly proof. I need a sim that will show a profit and a good one to booth. I am very confident but I want to do this correctly, not like some other bogus methods we have seen throughout the years, like Dahl etc. Nothing to discuss here really, until I have «the pudding recipe» down pat and only then can this method become available to the blackjack community. I will not make a claim before this, but I thank anyone who can help me with this project.

**Three** · 08-12-2015, 10:55 AM

The D'Albembert betting system doesn't work in the long run.

**DSchles** · 08-12-2015, 11:50 AM

What an utter waste of your time and money. Moreover, shame on the MIT crowd, if you are actually paying them for this. I'll take 10% of what you're paying them to tell you with 100% certainty that what you're doing doesn't work.

Don

**Picasso** · 08-12-2015, 01:17 PM

I'm more than ready to pay, I’m very confident. Let me crash into a wall or open a bottle of champagne, its called liberty. If I waist my money, so be it, I’ll be financing everything with my winnings. No risk.

No shame for M.I.T., money is money, even if most will call me stupid. Either way, I'll let this board know: if I fail I will be the first to admit it, if not...

To Tthree: it's not a D'Alembert, I have evolved

**ZenMaster_Flash** · 08-12-2015, 02:34 PM

Picasso,

I suppose that you also have a faultless design for a perpetual motion machine.

Hang on ! You'll need a venture capitalist or two to lay a few million bucks on ya'

**metronome** · 08-12-2015, 03:26 PM

Afraid the puddin' recipe is going to have Saccharin instead of sugar

**Picasso** · 08-12-2015, 04:32 PM

Originally Posted by Tthree

The D'Albembert betting system doesn't work in the long run.

I agree

**seriousplayer** · 08-15-2015, 08:01 AM

Originally Posted by Picasso

I agree

If you agree that D'Albembert betting system doesn't work in the long run. Than what is the sense of you requesting to simulate your betting system which is also a progression system?? Your progression system also doesn't work in the long run.