See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 14 to 26 of 65

Thread: Stanford Wong & Craps

  1. #14


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by FlightMedicNoMore View Post
    Thank you for the link to one of the most insite filled physics articles I've read regarding craps in quite some time.
    What did Bryce say at the end of the article? This doesn't prove it can't be beaten but proves it is
    unbeatable. what is that!?

  2. #15


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by FlightMedicNoMore View Post
    Getting back to my original question, does Wong's endorsement of dice control have any effect on your respect for the man's work on BJ?
    no.

  3. #16
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,470
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by gamblingghost View Post
    What did Bryce say at the end of the article? This doesn't prove it can't be beaten but proves it is
    unbeatable. what is that!?
    It's the difference between "shadow of a doubt" and "reasonable doubt."
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  4. #17


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Without a 'shadow of a doubt' Bryce is eloquent. But I have 'reasonable doubt' that he
    "proved" anything in that article.

  5. #18


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Crapsmaster where are you?

  6. #19
    Junior Member Suwon Fish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Land of the Morning Calm
    Posts
    24


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by gamblingghost View Post
    Without a 'shadow of a doubt' Bryce is eloquent. But I have 'reasonable doubt' that he
    "proved" anything in that article.
    The article was more about disproving things I guess. Most importantly is that high speed filming has shown that both dice don't have the same energy in flight, so assumptions that they will peform in an equal way after hitting the rubber is just wrong. That's powerfully damning right there.

    My 10 cents....

    1 Casinos are as scared of dice APs as they are of progression system gamblers. Check the dark side forums and you'll find NO reference to this kind of advantage play. No Griffin book, no dice sharks working for the house observing shooters. Nothing. Dice have been around for a while, I suspect casinos would have got wind of any possible (workable) controlled throwing by now.

    2 Cheating with dice in some circumstances is easy. Actually, really easy for anyone with enough magic skills to get a gig entertaining children. Cheating with dice probably started the day dice were invented, 1,000s of years ago.

    If I was going to cheat at dice, and gained a reputation for being "lucky", I would come up with a nonsense story about how I practiced 10 hours a day for years, using a secret that I got from a Swarmi, yadda, yadda, yadda...

    My bet is historic dice cheats created a myth of dice control that sensible men and women have wasted months/years trying to emulate. I'm not sure, but it's persuasive for me.

    I also understand how a fellow could fool himself into believing he is controlling dice. It's such a wildly difficult thing to do that winning streaks (yes, streaks exist) are attributed to being "in the zone" and losing streaks are attributed to being "a little off" today. All superstition, faith and delusion works in about the same way.

    Again, pure voodoo, but Stanford Wong rocks anyway. We are none of us perfect, I wager most of my money using Japanese Candlestick voodoo ^^
    Last edited by Suwon Fish; 12-28-2011 at 07:55 AM.

  7. #20


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by RWM View Post
    Here is Bryce Carlson's take. (Author of Blackjack For Blood) I think his argument is persuasive.
    http://www.richardmunchkin.com/2011/...ntrol-not.html
    That was pursuasive. And...I'm more skeptical again. And to answer the OP, no, Wong's work on craps does not diminish in my mind his tremendous contributions to blackjack.

  8. #21


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Well we know he has a lot of expertise in blackjack so it doesn't affect my thoughts on him in that regard at all. According to the link RWM put up, doesn't it say he has since removed the dice control links in the green chip forum? It's been a little bit since I listened to it.

  9. #22


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I was surprised when Wong came on the show. I expected him to be a big supporter of dice control, but he was not. He pretty much backed away from that position saying that he has now seen high-speed video of the dice landing and it appears that the thrower has no control. He didn't flat out say it was hogwash, but did say it was not the way to make money gambling.

    I also want to point out that this is BIG business. Not for Wong, but for Scoblete and the Golden Touch people. They held a seminar a couple months ago where they had 69 students. The initial GT class is $1200 so you do the math. Not bad for a weekends work.

  10. #23
    Random number herder Norm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    The mote in God's eye
    Posts
    12,470
    Blog Entries
    59


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Nonetheless, the Craps page is back at bj21.
    "I don't think outside the box; I think of what I can do with the box." - Henri Matisse

  11. #24
    Member FlightMedicNoMore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    On the Road Again
    Posts
    74


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    As Norm mentioned the craps page is back on BJ21 and Stanford has not backed off his assertion that it could be done only that it requires an inordinate amount of practice and he has not put the requisite time in since the publication of his book.
    All bleeding stops eventually.

  12. #25
    Member FlightMedicNoMore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    On the Road Again
    Posts
    74


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Can you please list changes the casinos have made in the landing surface since you witnessed this monster roll.
    All bleeding stops eventually.

  13. #26
    Senior Member bigplayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    1,807


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    No thinking about it...it is pure voodoo. If it were possible there we would know of several dozen craps players who have become multi-millionaires or even billionaires shooting craps. Even a couple dozen skilled shooters would be enough to change the game of casino craps forever. Instead...you have had casinos go from 2x odds to 3-4-5x, 10x, or even offering 100x odds.

    Now if you're talking short throws or dice sliding that is another question. If you're talking dice throws that meet the requirments of going the length of the table and at least one die hitting the back wall it absolutely cannot be done. The fact that these dice guys sell their techniques instead of making hundreds of millions of dollars using these techniques should tell you all you need to know. The best way to beat craps remains abusing the casino comp system via real or paper losses.

    I will add that it was possible to beat some craps games in a "tub" configuration using legit throws...but then if they let you throw from 12 inches away from the wall it's the casino's own fault. I watched a guy destroy a Wendover casino on a half-table.
    Last edited by bigplayer; 12-29-2011 at 01:23 PM.

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.