
21forme: Question for Don re results calc.
Don,
Assuming I'm playing a standard AC game (8D, S17, no surr, etc.) using HiLo count, I18, spreading 1:10, with max bet at +4 and wonging out at 1. How would I calculate the likelihood of being in +EV territory for a given number of hours of play? Thanks.

Don Schlesinger: Re: Question for Don re results calc.
> Don,
> Assuming I'm playing a standard AC game (8D, S17, no
> surr, etc.) using HiLo count, I18, spreading 1:10,
Optimally, or with some kind of rational pattern?
> with max bet at +4 and wonging out at 1. How would I
> calculate the likelihood of being in +EV territory for
> a given number of hours of play? Thanks.
Not sure I understand what you mean by "being in positive EV territory." Are you asking what the likelihood is that you'll be winning money after a certain number of hours of play, or are you asking what percentage of an hour you spend with positive EV, on average?
Don

21forme: Re: Question for Don re results calc.
> Optimally, or with some kind of rational pattern?
Optimally.
> Not sure I understand what you mean by "being in
> positive EV territory." Are you asking what the
> likelihood is that you'll be winning money after a
> certain number of hours of play, or are you asking
> what percentage of an hour you spend with positive EV,
> on average?
> Don
I'm looking for the likelihood of having won money after x number of hours of play. Thanks.

Don Schlesinger: Re: Question for Don re results calc.
> I'm looking for the likelihood of having won money
> after x number of hours of play. Thanks.
That's what I thought. Easier to express that as "the probability of being ahead after x hours of play." Table 2.2 of BJA3, p. 21, gives some representative numbers.
Do you know your hourly e.v. and s.d? If so, the answer is straightforward. If not, I can probably get the values for you.
Don

Don Schlesinger: Re: Question for Don re results calc.
> Don,
> Assuming I'm playing a standard AC game (8D, S17, no
> surr, etc.) using HiLo count, I18, spreading 1:10,
> with max bet at +4 and wonging out at 1. How would I
> calculate the likelihood of being in +EV territory for
> a given number of hours of play? Thanks.
DO you have BJA3? If so, see pp. 1921, especially Table 2.2, on p. 21. If not, write back, and I can walk you through hourly e.v., s.d. and the method needed to find your answer.
Don

21forme: Re: Question for Don re results calc.
> DO you have BJA3?
Does a bear go poopoo in the woods? :.) Of course, I do.
If so, see pp. 1921, especially
> Table 2.2, on p. 21. If not, write back, and I can
> walk you through hourly e.v., s.d. and the method
> needed to find your answer.
> Don
Table 2.2 gives me what I need to know. Thanks!

Don Schlesinger: Re: Question for Don re results calc.
> Does a bear go poopoo in the woods? :.) Of course, I
> do.
LOL! Then, you have to know how to use it as a reference tool! :)
> Table 2.2 gives me what I need to know. Thanks!
Glad to oblige.
Don
Posting Permissions
 You may not post new threads
 You may not post replies
 You may not post attachments
 You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules
Bookmarks