Hi to all,

In one of the archived posts I made a slight mistake on one of the Risk-Aversed Indices (T,L index is not +4). Sometimes SE is not on our side

Conditions: 6D, Hi-Lo
Separating the Hi-Lo tags into four categories:

T = Ten
A = Ace
Z = 7,8,9
L = 2,3,4,5,6

we get the following summarized table:

          +-------+-----+-----+ 
| AL | EM | RA |
+---------+-------+-----+-----+
| Generic | +3.01 | +3 | +3 |
| A,A | +2.37 | +2 | +3 |
| A,T | +2.82 | +3 | +3 |
| A,Z | +2.57 | +3 | +3 |
| A,L | +2.73 | +3 | +3 |
| T,T | +3.28 | +3 | +4 |
| T,Z | +3.01 | +3 | +3 |
| T,L | +3.18 | +3 | +3 |
| Z,Z | +2.76 | +3 | +3 |
| Z,L | +2.92 | +3 | +3 |
| L,L | +3.09 | +3 | +3 |
+---------+-------+-----+-----+

being AL = Algebraic Index
EM = EV-Maximized Index
RA = RA Index


EM and RA were both run on a 6D game and the Risk Aversion used an optimal 1-12 betting spread.

Sincerely,
Cac