I think I understand that at a table with few players vs a full table you can make more because the game is faster and you get to see more hands.
I imagine the hourly variance is lower at a full table because you are playing fewer hands per hour.
My question if I word it correctly is:
Is the per hand variance lower when alone vs a full table?
> I think I understand that at a table with few players
> vs a full table you can make more because the game is
> faster and you get to see more hands.
Right.
> I imagine the hourly variance is lower at a full table
> because you are playing fewer hands per hour.
Right again.
> My question if I word it correctly is:
> Is the per hand variance lower when alone vs a full
> table?
No.
Don
Actually, it's probably slightly greater, because by the time you get your cards at a full table, the TC might have changed quite a bit before the initial two cards are on the felt.
> Actually, it's probably slightly greater, because by
> the time you get your cards at a full table, the TC
> might have changed quite a bit before the initial two
> cards are on the felt.
Why would that change the variance of the hand??
Don
Posting Permissions
-*-
Bookmarks