George C,
George, after reading a little about your play back several years ago, you chose to use the Zen count rather than your unbalanced count in the 2 deck game, was there a particular reason? Or do you think that the Zen is a tad more accurate than your unbalanced count. Also why not the Hi-opt 2 since the numbers are almost identical other than 6 and ace? Thanks for your feedback.
> George C,
> George, after reading a little about your play back
> several years ago, you chose to use the Zen count
> rather than your unbalanced count in the 2 deck game,
> was there a particular reason? Or do you think that
> the Zen is a tad more accurate than your unbalanced
> count. Also why not the Hi-opt 2 since the numbers are
> almost identical other than 6 and ace? Thanks for your
> feedback.
Will let George respond, if he sees, this, but on p. 171 of BJA3, UBZ2 SCOREs slightly better than Zen in the double-deck games we studied.
Don
Posting Permissions
-*-
Bookmarks