> Indeed.

> Fascinating. All the level 2 true-counted
> ace-reckoned systems are virtually
> identical.

> With full credit, of course. You'll be the
> 21st century version of Julian Braun. :-)

> Sounds good to me. As discussed in other
> threads, my main concern is that equivalent
> indices be used for all systems, in order to
> give us a true comparison of system strength
> rather than index strength.

> Done. Actually, I would think that Don will
> want to archive it, as it certainly provides
> some hard numbers for a lot of discussions.

> Now, if I just had a similar set of numbers
> for a representative double deck game, say
> 2D, H17, DOA, DAS, SPA1, SPL3, NS, 67% pen
> (70/104), Catch-22 floored indices, heads-up
> . . . :-)

I can't help you here since I don't have data for SD or DD. I had already calculated those for 6D and that's why I posted them here.
But now that you know how I did it it would very easy to run CVdata for any desired set of rules.
Also, you can run RA-indices instead of EM-indices.

Sincerely,
Cac