> What I meant when I said that my
> opinion
> differs a little from yours was about your?s
> statement that "Silver-Fox is a bad
> count for
> 6dks" which is not exactly true, ?cause
> for
> practical matters is as good as highlow,
> despite
> the fact that it?s obviously working more
> for
> 1.47$ less per 10000$ bankroll. That goes
> directly against American utilitarism, I
> know :-)

I said that it isn't so good which is not the same as saying it's bad. But you're right that I exaggerated a little

> (P.S. Congrats for your nice work above,I?ll
> keep a hard copy, too.)

Thank you!

Sincerely,
Cacarulo