With Best Strategy at TC0 using HiLo
the winner is absence of 78s (EV= +2.48 for 0x7 and 0x8))
second place is absence of 789s (EV = +1.955 (0x7, 0x8, 0x9))
third place is absence of 7s (EV=...
But with the count of sevens, the true count of Hi-Lo is also zero.
I think you could do more tests with different blocks and see which one is the most effective. For example: 78s, 89s, 79s,...
Not surprisingly using same as above with 0x12, 12x8 and 12x9 the EV is positive (+0.525 with Basic strategy and +1.35 with Best strategy. With 24x7sm 12x8 and 12x9, EV is negative (-1.609 basic...
"I get player edge ~= .1646%"
I used BJA3, pp. 492-3. Can you show me your breakdown to see where we may differ.
6D H17 = -0.761. DAS = + 0.144. Split aces once with multiple hits = +0.177. ES...
"Hit 10 vs. 9 at TC < -2. Surrender 8 vs. A at TC >=+10. Surrender 13 vs. T at TC >=+3. Surrender 12 vs. T at TC >=+8."
Sorry for the typo. Don't know how the zero got in there.
Don
I get player edge ~= .1646%
My revised CA generates running count indexes based on a player hand (total or composition) and pen (cards remaining). The RC indexes at midshoe translated to true...
Hi Sec,
The problem is that only CA programs can detect the best strategy. In my opinion, the best way to evaluate side counts is through correlation analysis.
In the case of side counts that...