See the top rated post in this thread. Click here

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 13 of 46

Thread: Card counting strategy

  1. #1


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Card counting strategy

    Hi guys,
    I'm currently practicing KO preferred but I was wondering if there is any other counting system (a more difficult one) that has a higher playing efficiency than KO but at the same time there is no need for true count calculation.
    Many thanks.

  2. #2


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Fabian90,

    Systems that don't require a "true count" conversion are called "unbalanced" systems: instead of using the TC for betting and playing decisions, unbalanced systems use just the running count (RC). Thus, KO is an unbalanced system. Since KO uses card tags of -1, 0, and +1 only, KO is called a "Level 1" system. For that matter, HiLo is also a Level 1 system.

    One very powerful unbalanced system is the "Unbalanced Zen2" system (also known as UBZII). UBZII is a Level 2 unbalanced system that was developed by a long-time (and still current) player writing under the handle "George C." His book is available in a Kindle edition from Amazon: go there and search for "The UnBalanced Zen2".

    Hope this helps!

    Dog Hand

  3. #3


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Dog Hand View Post
    Fabian90,

    Systems that don't require a "true count" conversion are called "unbalanced" systems: instead of using the TC for betting and playing decisions, unbalanced systems use just the running count (RC). Thus, KO is an unbalanced system. Since KO uses card tags of -1, 0, and +1 only, KO is called a "Level 1" system. For that matter, HiLo is also a Level 1 system.

    One very powerful unbalanced system is the "Unbalanced Zen2" system (also known as UBZII). UBZII is a Level 2 unbalanced system that was developed by a long-time (and still current) player writing under the handle "George C." His book is available in a Kindle edition from Amazon: go there and search for "The UnBalanced Zen2".

    Hope this helps!

    Dog Hand
    Many thanks for your help Dog Hand. Do you think its really important to purchase the book? I already have CVBJ and CVCX so I could learn and practice it using CVBJ. One more thing, how can I compare UBZII to KO preferred? I've just looked at both playing strategies on CVCX using practically the same bet spread and UBZII only earns a few more dollars an hour and practically the same RoR than KO preferred. Is this normal or am I doing something wrong?

  4. #4


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Depending on rules, conditions, decks, spread, etc., on average, UBZ2 will outperform K-O by 5-10%. All of the various comparisons can be found in the SCORE chapter of BJA3.

    Don

  5. #5


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Fabian90 View Post
    Many thanks for your help Dog Hand. Do you think its really important to purchase the book? I already have CVBJ and CVCX so I could learn and practice it using CVBJ. One more thing, how can I compare UBZII to KO preferred? I've just looked at both playing strategies on CVCX using practically the same bet spread and UBZII only earns a few more dollars an hour and practically the same RoR than KO preferred. Is this normal or am I doing something wrong?
    CVCX does not contain the full indices of UBZII for Multi-deck games. For any reason you want to use full indices on a Double Deck game you will need to generate playing indices using CVDATA.

  6. #6


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by seriousplayer View Post
    CVCX does not contain the full indices of UBZII for Multi-deck games. For any reason you want to use full indices on a Double Deck game you will need to generate playing indices using CVDATA.
    Thanks. Is there a way of finding out what indices cvcx does use? I thought of just learning the UBZII composite strategy from CVBJ v5.6, would the full indices make a massive difference?

  7. #7


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    I used REKO Full for a year before switching to UBZ2 at the beginning of this year. I used CVData to generate the full set of indexes for all the different games (varying rules and number of decks) I play. The book by George C. is not really useful at all if you have CVData and CVCX, because you can generate all the index numbers yourself and get accurate optimal bet spreads. And the kindle version of the book has really bad images of the charts that make a lot of the numbers illegible.

  8. #8


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Fabian90 View Post
    Thanks. Is there a way of finding out what indices cvcx does use? I thought of just learning the UBZII composite strategy from CVBJ v5.6, would the full indices make a massive difference?
    First I would identify the purpose why you are switching to UBZII.

  9. #9


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by seriousplayer View Post
    First I would identify the purpose why you are switching to UBZII.
    I started practicing Hi-Lo but to be honest I found the true count calculation quite difficult. I could divide by whole number of decks just okay but it still took me 2 to 3 seconds to make the division and round down. I could not imagine how it would be like to divide by "4.5 decks remaining" later on like some AP do when they get to a certain level, so I searched for the simplest unbalanced system and came across KO and REKO. I started practicing KO and found it to be very simple as keeping the correct running count hasn't been a problem so far. So now I'm searching for a more complicated system that performs better than KO but at the same time doesn't make use of the true count calculation.

  10. #10


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by Fabian90 View Post
    I started practicing Hi-Lo but to be honest I found the true count calculation quite difficult. I could divide by whole number of decks just okay but it still took me 2 to 3 seconds to make the division and round down. I could not imagine how it would be like to divide by "4.5 decks remaining" later on like some AP do when they get to a certain level, so I searched for the simplest unbalanced system and came across KO and REKO. I started practicing KO and found it to be very simple as keeping the correct running count hasn't been a problem so far. So now I'm searching for a more complicated system that performs better than KO but at the same time doesn't make use of the true count calculation.
    Performing better in terms of what? I am not trying to convince you to stay with KO but think about it KO already have a Betting Coefficient of 98% and UBZII has BC= 97%. Unless you want a count that has better playing efficiency and insurance correlation. Depending the games (Single Deck and Double Deck) you are playing the PE and IC of UBZII will outperform KO but not by much.

    If you are playing mostly shoe games than there is no need to switch in my opinion.

  11. #11


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by seriousplayer View Post
    Performing better in terms of what? I am not trying to convince you to stay with KO but think about it KO already have a Betting Coefficient of 98% and UBZII has BC= 97%. Unless you want a count that has better playing efficiency and insurance correlation. Depending the games (Single Deck and Double Deck) you are playing the PE and IC of UBZII will outperform KO but not by much.

    If you are playing mostly shoe games than there is no need to switch in my opinion.
    Thanks for the info. I normally play 6 or 8 deck shoes so probably the best thing will be to stay with KO for now. I'm still not 100% confident with the terms betting coefficient, IC.. so if anyone could direct me to a webpage with clear explanations I would appreciate it. Also if anyone knows any other unbalanced system far superior to KO in shoe games please let me know

  12. #12


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    UBZ2 is what you want if you are looking for a stronger unbalanced strategy. The betting correlation is only 1% less, while the playing efficiency and more importantly the insurance correlation is much greater than KO. Speaking from experience, I played with REKO full for a year and have been using ubz2 for 7 months and I would never go back. For me the increase in difficulty from going from a level one count to a level two count was insignificant. What was significant was ubz2 lets me find situations where I can bet at an advantage in the second round of a six deck shoe. I never had that with REKO. To me, REKO was extremely weighted to the end of a shoe, whereas with the two level count of ubz2, I can find advantages much earlier in a shoe when a slew of low cards comes out.

  13. #13


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No
    Quote Originally Posted by KronikBuddha View Post
    What was significant was ubz2 lets me find situations where I can bet at an advantage in the second round of a six deck shoe. I never had that with REKO. To me, REKO was extremely weighted to the end of a shoe, whereas with the two level count of ubz2, I can find advantages much earlier in a shoe when a slew of low cards comes out.
    Are you saying that REKO or KO missed early betting opportunities and over bet later in the shoes? If so the Color of Blackjack version of KO fixes that problem.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Accused of card counting without actually counting?
    By lilbucky in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 03-08-2014, 07:08 AM
  2. Strategy card
    By Jetjarv in forum General Blackjack Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-21-2013, 11:04 AM
  3. Norm Wattenberger: How to Create a Card Counting Strategy
    By Norm Wattenberger in forum Main Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-04-2004, 07:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

About Blackjack: The Forum

BJTF is an advantage player site based on the principles of comity. That is, civil and considerate behavior for the mutual benefit of all involved. The goal of advantage play is the legal extraction of funds from gaming establishments by gaining a mathematic advantage and developing the skills required to use that advantage. To maximize our success, it is important to understand that we are all on the same side. Personal conflicts simply get in the way of our goals.